Press releases

High primary energy factor jeopardizes renewable development

Published: 21/03/2012

Brussels/Utrecht, 21 March 2012 – Within the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive the Primary Energy Factor (PEF) is used when calculating the energy performance. The PEF accounts for the energy losses of electricity generation and transport when comparing electricity use with other types of energy use in the building. But a recent Ecofys study warns that PEFs are not an unambiguous scientific value. Edith Molenbroek, researcher at Ecofys said: “Calculation methods are not transparent, harmonised and consistent and are not always adjusted to higher shares of large-scale renewable electricity.”

These are the main conclusions from the study Primary energy factors for electricity in buildings’ (May 2011), executed by Ecofys. The PEF was originally intended to compare the burning of fossil fuels in a local burner with electrical energy generated in fossil fuel power stations. However, once a significant share of the electricity is generated by renewable energy, the concept of primary energy loses value.

That said, when evaluating the energy performance of buildings, a correction factor penalizing the energy losses in the electricity system is still required. The Ecofys study recognizes this, but argues that the PEF should be taken for what it is: not an unambiguous scientific value, but rather a political instrument intended to maximize the contribution of buildings to a sustainable energy economy.

Being a political value implies that it can be calculated in different ways. Ecofys studied the PEF calculation methods used in seven EU Member States and demonstrated a lack of consistency. “In certain Member States, we could not discover the underlying calculation procedures at all”, said Molenbroek.
Since various calculation methods are being used, their effects and the consequences of each of them should be evaluated very carefully. Ecofys studied the extent to which the PEF can stimulate energy efficient buildings, the use of local renewables, and centralized renewable power. It demonstrates that those goals can oppose each other when defining the PEF calculation method, and describes solutions to get around such conflicts.

One of the undesired side effects could be that the high PEFs (compared to the given electricity supply mix in that country) used by some EU Member States may hamper the development of grid-coupled renewable energy in the long run. A high PEF for renewables (e.g. > 1 in Spain and Sweden) leads to a high average PEF, even in a country with massive deployment of renewable energy. As a result, the small amount of heating energy that is still required in low energy houses tends to be supplied by local fossil fuel burners instead of using the increasingly renewable grid electricity. It also prevents using the storage capacity of electrical heating systems as a buffer against the intermittent nature of renewables, which could jeopardize further growth of grid-coupled renewable electricity.

This example of negative feedback shows that a dynamic approach for the PEF is required, as the energy mix for electricity generation is expected to evolve drastically in the upcoming decades. The Ecofys study recommends re-evaluating PEF calculations at regular and timely intervals and adapting them to changing needs and circumstances.

Characters with spaces: 3.350

The full report is available for download at
Ecofys – Experts in Energy
Established in 1984 with the vision of achieving “sustainable energy for everyone”, Ecofys has become the leading expert in renewable energy, energy & carbon efficiency, energy systems & markets as well as energy & climate policies. The unique synergy between those areas of expertise is the key to its success. Ecofys creates smart, effective, practical and sustainable solutions for and with public and corporate clients all over the world. With offices in the Netherlands, Germany, the United Kingdom, China and the US, Ecofys employs over 250 experts dedicated to solving energy and climate challenges.

For further information, please contact:
Marielle Vosbeek
Press Office
Kanaalweg 15-G
3526 KL Utrecht
T: +31 (0)30 662-3402

European Copper Institute
The European Copper Institute is a joint venture between the world's mining companies, represented by the International Copper Association, and the European copper industry. Its mission is to promote copper's benefits to modern society across Europe, through its Brussels office and a network of eleven Copper Development Associations. In fulfilling its mission, ECI manages a broad range of advocacy and education activities. Dissemination to target audiences is carried out through the national Copper Development Associations located in the Benelux, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Russia, Scandinavia, Spain and the UK.

Leonardo ENERGY
Leonardo ENERGY is an initiative managed by the European Copper Institute and its European network of 11 offices, dedicated to advocacy and education on sustainable energy systems, through building information centres to serve designers, engineers, general managers, regulators and teachers, who are professionally involved with energy. Through various projects, including the award-winning Leonard Power Quality Initiative, over 170 partners from leading academia and industry are involved with Leonardo ENERGY.